Lower-risk models face excessive reviews, banks say
Skip to main content
Risk Benchmarking: Validation workload stretching teams, amid emerging regulatory divergence
This piece is part of a series benchmarking bank model risk management practices. Risk Management subscribers can view selected cuts of the underlying data here. Sign up for Risk Benchmarking emails here.
Banks complain they are expending scarce resources validating models of limited importance, with fears over the capacity of teams to meet internal and regulatory demands.
More than half of banks
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Model risk managers see growing regulatory divergence
Risk Benchmarking study finds most banks expect easing of model risk supervisory scrutiny in the US, but tightening in Europe
Many banks do not document failure plans for Tier 1 models
Risk Benchmarking: Strong predeployment validation gives way to ad hoc escalation of breaches, even at some large lenders
Model risk managers are being asked to do more with less
Risk Benchmarking study finds function being handed expanding AI workload, on flat resources
Banks are automating GenAI testing, but scope varies widely
Risk Benchmarking: LLM-as-judge offers model testing at scale, but few lenders use it to facilitate autonomous sign-off
Model Risk Benchmarking 2026: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 44-bank study, covering model inventories, resourcing, GenAI governance, validation and regulation
A third of banks do not maintain logs for GenAI models
Risk Benchmarking study finds few banks review prompt logs systematically, with larger firms focusing on higher risk use cases
Few banks formally evaluate GenAI human-in-the-loop controls
Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs and challengers use tools to test controls efficacy; others rely on judgement
From gatekeeper to coach: model risk bids to reinvent itself
Model Risk Benchmarking data reveals a function in flux, grappling with resource cuts, AI models, regulatory divergence
Most read articles loading…
Back to Top
You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.
