Few banks formally evaluate GenAI human-in-the-loop controls
Skip to main content
Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs and challengers use tools to test controls efficacy; others rely on judgement
This piece is part of a series benchmarking bank model risk management practices. Sign up for Risk Benchmarking emails here.
Only one in five banks use tools to formally monitor the effectiveness of the human-in-the-loop (HITL) controls they apply to generative AI or large language models (LLMs), Risk Benchmarking’s inaugural Model Risk Management study finds.
Four of the six global systemically
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Most read articles loading…
Back to Top
You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.
